A lawyer for former House Speaker Michael Madigan instructed jurors initially of his corruption trial that the Democratic powerhouse was “fully ignorant” of what folks had been saying behind his again and “by no means made calls for of anybody” .
But in a case with tons of of wiretapped recordings, it is Madigan’s precise phrases that matter. And the jury had a carefree Thursday.
A collection of wiretapped court docket calls captured the famously reticent Madigan talking bluntly about every little thing from forcing longtime Rep. Lou Lang out of the Legislature to calling then-Senate President John Cullerton into the woodshed for marketing campaign adverts that they dared to criticize the speaker. throughout the 2018 basic elections.
“I feel this man goes to be an ongoing downside,” Madigan instructed her longtime confidante, Michael McClain, in a name about Lang, a Skokie Democrat who was going through potential sexual harassment fees. “If you suppose I’m unsuitable inform me I’m unsuitable, however I do not see how (Lang) continues now.”
In a subsequent name, McClain instructed Madigan that Lang did not seem to have gotten the message and requested, “When would you like me to name Lang and switch down the mic on him? Because he does not perceive it.”
“Sooner or later,” Madigan replied.
The calls, which had been captured by an FBI wiretap on McClain’s telephone, paint Madigan as a particularly lively individual, entrenched in day by day political trivialities and notably involved concerning the detrimental optics that the actions of others doubtlessly posed to him.
In an intriguing 2018 telephone name, Madigan requested McClain to achieve out to Sam Panayotovich, a former state consultant from Chicago who had a lobbying enterprise with Joe Berrios, the longtime Cook County assessor who was underneath indictment for marketing campaign contributions from actual property legal professionals who had achieved so. enterprise along with his workplace.
“Are you ready to advise Mr. Panayotovich to avoid me?” Madigan requested, in keeping with the decision performed for jurors.
McClain instantly referred to as Panayotovich. In that decision, additionally performed for the jury, she instructed him very sternly, “Hey, you requested you and Joe to go see the speaker. There’s a feeding frenzy on this man proper now…the optics simply aren’t proper for him.”
The calls heard Thursday had been the primary of about 200 undercover audio and video recordings that kind the middle of the prosecution’s case in opposition to Madigan, the nation’s longest-serving legislative chief, who ran the state Democratic Party and for years was extensively seen as probably the most highly effective politician within the state.
Through tapes, emails and letters, jurors Thursday additionally bought a transparent window into the connection between Madigan and McClain, who served collectively within the Legislature within the Nineteen Seventies and fashioned a friendship that put McClain within the extraordinarily uncommon place of getting the ear of the speaker.
McClain’s admiration for Madigan bordered on servility, each in entrance of the President and behind his again, court docket filings to this point seem to indicate.
He greeted Madigan along with his title — “Hello, President” — and jumped on the alternative to fulfill in Madigan’s places of work or go to dinner collectively. The males had been so shut that Madigan used McClain’s telephone to speak to his spouse about matters as mundane as a dinner menu.
“So they’ve three soups,” Madigan mentioned, his voice on the tape echoing by the courtroom. “Cream of broccoli, spinach with egg drops…”
The transcript reveals that at that time the FBI stopped listening to the decision.
McClain retired from lobbying in 2016, quickly after a vital ComEd-related invoice handed the House and was signed into legislation. In a letter to Madigan asserting his retirement, he was effusive in his reward and referred to Madigan as his “true consumer.”
“I’m prepared with the blessing of (my spouse) Cinda to carry out ‘duties,'” he wrote within the letter uncovered to the jurors. “Michael, you’ll have to determine if you would like me to do that, legally and ethically. I supply it. … At the top of the day I’m on the bridge with my musket standing with and for the Madigan household.”
Apparently these “assignments” from Madigan got here ceaselessly. Years later, in February 2019, McClain continued to discuss with Madigan as his “actual consumer.”
“My consumer is just not ComEd, my consumer is just not CBOE, my consumer is just not Walgreens, my consumer is the Speaker,” McClain instructed a former Madigan staffer in a February 2019 telephone name performed in court docket Thursday.
Madigan, 82, of Chicago, who was speaker of the Illinois House for many years and head of the state Democratic Party, faces racketeering fees that allege he ran his state and political operations as a legal enterprise, plotting with Utility giants ComEd and AT&T gave his associates contracts that required little or no work and used his public place to drum up enterprise for his personal legislation agency.
Both Madigan and McClain, 77, a former contract lobbyist for ComEd from southern Quincy state, have pleaded not responsible and denied any wrongdoing.
The trial, which started Oct. 8, began slowly however ramped up considerably Thursday because the recordings had been performed.
The day additionally featured testimony from Lang, who gave jurors context for a number of wiretapped calls concerning the embarrassing finish to his 30-year legislative profession, which centered on a sexual harassment allegation that Madigan believed was about to develop into public .
Lang had beforehand testified twice for the U.S. Attorney’s Office on the identical points, first within the “ComEd Four” corruption case, wherein McClain and three others had been convicted, after which within the perjury trial of ComEd’s former chief of workers. Madigan Tim Mapes.
But this was the primary time Lang had testified within the room along with his previous boss. At the beginning of his two hours on the witness stand, Lang was requested to go searching the courtroom and establish Madigan.
“He’s waving at me,” Lang mentioned.
Madigan, sitting on the head of the protection desk, had in reality raised his hand in a pleasant gesture.
Lang had hoped to stay within the House and resume a high-ranking function on Madigan’s House Democratic management workforce. He had been accused of sexual harassment in May 2018 and resigned from his function as deputy majority chief pending an investigation, however his accuser didn’t take part in a legislative inspector basic investigation.
The IG in the end decided that the fees in opposition to Lang couldn’t be substantiated, a discovering that Lang mentioned exonerated him.
In September 2018, a wiretap caught McClain and Madigan talking overtly about Lang’s lack of political future with House Democrats, already reeling from Madigan’s ouster of high aides over sexual harassment allegations in early 2018, on the peak of the nationwide #MeToo motion.
Two months later, McClain contacted Lang with the supply of resigning. Lang testified that McClain had already floated the concept in a earlier assembly.
“Hey, Lou, um, what have you ever determined about switching to a different profession?” McClain mentioned initially of the decision on November 8, 2023. “I’m not the one speaking anymore. I’m an agent, somebody who actually cares deeply about you, who thinks it is best to actually transfer on.”
McClain additionally famous that Lang’s potential new accuser had threatened to go public if he remained “in cost.”
“Well, okay,” Lang mentioned. “So that is one thing I’ll have to think about, however extra necessary than what you must say is what you must say.”
McClain assured Lang that he would don’t have any problem discovering work, particularly with Madigan’s help. Lang responded that he had already obtained a proposal or two, however “he might merely select to go it alone.”
“I admire you being sincere with me,” Lang instructed McClain. “I would not do something to hurt my speaker or my caucus. He was excellent to me.
Lang resigned simply days earlier than being sworn in for a brand new time period in January 2019.
On the witness stand, Lang mentioned he knew McClain was saying he was merely a messenger for Madigan, who was now not fascinated about giving Lang a extra highly effective place within the House.
“The President needed me gone,” Lang instructed jurors, saying he believed if he left quietly, Madigan may use his affect to throw him some offers.
Asked Thursday whether or not the decision had impacted his profession, Lang did not hesitate.
“It was very clear to me from this name that my profession was at a standstill, as a result of the speaker was in charge of my skill to rise by the ranks and get the management that I needed to have,” Lang testified.
He mentioned he later met with Madigan alone in individual to “look him within the eye and get his feedback on these points.” He mentioned Madigan confirmed what McClain had instructed him.
Before the intercepted name was broadcast, Lang gave jurors a meticulously detailed take a look at how the payments made it to the House – or not.
And he reiterated what earlier former lawmakers have mentioned on the witness stand: Madigan had the ultimate say on which payments had an opportunity of changing into legislation and which might languish in committee.
“Every from time to time the president or (Madigan’s) chief of workers would simply say ‘maintain the invoice.’ Sometimes there could be a proof and generally there would not be,” Lang mentioned. “The ultimate choice maker has at all times been Speaker Madigan.”
During cross-examination by Madigan lawyer Todd Pugh, Lang famous that Madigan by no means explicitly ordered him to do something, and Lang mentioned he by no means voted in opposition to his conscience due to an instruction from Madigan.
Lang initially voted no on ComEd-sponsored “Smart Grid” laws that prosecutors say was central to the corruption fees in opposition to Madigan. He suffered no penalties from Madigan for that vote, he testified.
And there have been many causes – strategic, political or in any other case – why a invoice might die in committee, Lang famous.
Lang additionally agreed that Madigan was an clever and educated speaker with an unbelievable work ethic.
“I do not know anybody of their profession who had a stronger work ethic than Mike Madigan,” he mentioned.
jmeisner@chicagotribune.com
mcrepeau@chicagotribune.com
rlong@chicagotribune.com
Originally printed:
