“When the readers found the reality about how the ebook was created, many had been injured. I potted deeply, however it was crucial,” he says.
Wired interviewed Colamedici in a dialog that explored the shades of his undertaking.
This interview has been modified for size and readability.
Wired: What was the inspiration for the philosophical experiment?
Andrea Colamedici: First of all, I train to suppose prepared on the European Institute of Design and Guido a analysis undertaking on synthetic intelligence and on thought methods on the University of Foggia. Working with my college students, I noticed that they had been utilizing chatgpt within the worst approach: copying from it. I noticed that they had been shedding an understanding of life by counting on synthetic intelligence, which is alarming, as a result of we dwell in an period the place we now have entry to an ocean of information, however we have no idea what to do with it. I might usually warn them: “You can get good votes, additionally construct an important profession utilizing chatgpt to cheat, however you’ll turn out to be empty”. I’ve fashioned professors of various Italian universities and plenty of ask me: “When can I cease studying to make use of chatgpt?” The reply isn’t. It isn’t a query of finishing an training in AI, however of about As study while you use it. “
We should preserve our curiosity alive in the course of the appropriate use of this software and educating it to work as we would like. It all begins with an important distinction: there may be info that makes you passive, that erodes your capacity to suppose over time, and there may be info that problem you, that make you smarter by pushing you past your limits. This is how we should always use the IA: as an interlocutor who helps us to suppose in another way. Otherwise, we is not going to perceive that these instruments are designed by giant technological firms that impose a sure ideology. They select the information, the connections between them and, above all, deal with us as prospects to be glad. If we use the IA on this approach, it is going to solely affirm our prejudices. We will suppose we’re proper, however in actuality we is not going to suppose; We will probably be digitally embraced. We can not afford this numbness. This was the start line of the ebook. The second problem was like describing what is going on now. For Gilles Deleuze, philosophy is the flexibility to create ideas and right now we want new ones to know our actuality. Without them, we’re misplaced. Just watch the video of Gaza di Trump, generated by the AI - or the provocations of figures like Musk. Without strong conceptual instruments, we had been wrecked. A great thinker creates ideas which can be just like the keys that enable us to know the world.
What was your aim with the brand new ebook?
The ebook tries to do three: to assist readers turn out to be alphabetized, to invent a brand new idea for this period and to be theoretical and sensible on the similar time. When the readers found the reality about how the ebook was created, many had been injured. I remorse it deeply, however it was crucial. Some folks mentioned: “I would really like this creator to exist.” Well, it would not. We should perceive that we construct our narratives. If we don’t do it, the acute proper will monopolize the narratives, will create myths and can go our life to regulate the details whereas writing the story. We can not enable this to occur.
How did you utilize the IA that will help you write this philosophical essay?
I wish to make clear that the IA didn’t write the essay. Yes, I used synthetic intelligence, however not conventionally. I developed a way that I train the European Institute of Design, based mostly on the creation of opposition. It is a mind-set and utilizing automated studying in an antagonistic approach. I did not ask the automobile to write down for me, however as a substitute he generated concepts after which I used GPTs and Claude to criticize them, to offer me prospects about what I had written. Everything that’s written within the ebook is mine. Artificial intelligence is a software that we should study to make use of, as a result of if we use it improper – and “abuse” contains therapy as a type of oracle, asking him to “inform me the reply to the questions of the world; to elucidate to me why it exists”, so we lose our capacity to suppose. We turn out to be silly. Nam June Paik, an important artist from the 90s, mentioned: “I take advantage of know-how to hate it appropriately”. And that is what we now have to do: perceive it, as a result of if we do not do it, it is going to use us. The IA will turn out to be the software that Big Tech makes use of to examine and manipulate us. We should study to make use of these instruments appropriately; Otherwise, we’ll face a major problem.
