He added that India fears that these teams are coming back from their “protected haven” in Canada and different Western international locations, the place they may probably orchestrate an unhindered insurgency.
“India argues that this might, sooner or later, pose one other critical violent menace to India,” Kugelman instructed CNA’s Asia First.
“Canada sees it very in a different way. He doesn’t imagine he’s giving refuge to anti-India extremists. He believes…that these are Sikh separatists who’re activists, and what they do and say is protected by free speech legal guidelines in Canada.”
How is that this a matter of proof?
Another difficulty on the heart of rising tensions issues the proof to help Canada’s public accusations.
While Canada has made a number of allegations publicly, it has not supplied the proof wanted to help them, underscoring how doing so may undermine the integrity of the investigation, Kugelman mentioned.
“But the extra allegations which might be made out there to the general public, the extra stress (there may be) on Canada to offer very particular proof,” he mentioned.
Ruparelia mentioned the disconnect might lie in what counts as proof.
“It might merely be that… (the) proof, for the Indian authorities, has not reached a threshold that they’re proud of or comfy with,” he mentioned.
He added that for Canada the answer is for India to cooperate with its investigation and look into it. For India, the request is that Canada share proof in a manner it deems ample to set off motion. “This is the deadlock proper now,” he mentioned.
