Hip-hop megastar Jay-Z has emphatically denied allegations in a lawsuit that he and fellow entertainer Sean “Diddy” Combs raped a 13-year-old woman greater than twenty years in the past.
The criticism was amended Sunday in U.S. District Court in New York so as to add Jay-Z as a defendant after initially being filed towards Combs in October. It is alleged they “took turns assaulting the minor” throughout a celebration following the MTV Video Music Awards in 2000.
In the declaration Posted Sunday by Roc Nation, Jay-Z’s leisure firm, attacked Tony Buzbee, the nameless accuser’s lawyer.
“These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file felony fees, not civil ones!” the assertion stated. “Anyone who commits such against the law towards a minor ought to be locked up, do not you agree?”
The assertion calls the lawsuit’s claims “idiotic” and one thing that may be laughable “had been it not for the seriousness surrounding hurt to youngsters.”
“You have made a horrible error of judgment in pondering that every one ‘celebrities are the identical,’” the assertion learn. “I’m not out of your world. I’m a younger man who made it out of the Brooklyn undertaking. We do not play a majority of these video games. We have very strict codes and honor. Let’s defend youngsters. …”
Federal prosecutors charged Combs in September with crimes together with intercourse trafficking and racketeering. He has pleaded not responsible.
Buzbee, a Texas-based lawyer, filed a number of lawsuits towards Combs after his arrest. The lawyer didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
In November, an nameless movie star sued Buzbee in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accusing the lawyer of threatening to “unleash wholly fabricated and malicious sexual assault fees” if the movie star didn’t attend a “mediation confidential”. The lawsuit states that Buzbee claimed the movie star raped “a number of minors, each female and male, who had been drugged at events hosted by Combs.”
On Sunday, Buzbee pushed again at Jay-Z on social media: “Mr. Carter had beforehand denied that he was the one who sued me and my firm. He filed his frivolous case underneath a pseudonym. … Since I despatched the letter on his behalf, Mr. Carter has not solely sued me, however has tried to intimidate and harass me and this plaintiff. His conduct had the alternative impact. She is inspired. I’m very pleased with his dedication.”
Times workers author Richard Winton contributed to this report.
