Federal prosecutors are anticipated on Wednesday to play a primary wave of almost 200 secretly recorded conversations within the historic corruption trial of former House Speaker Michael Madigan, together with a collection of calls between the highly effective speaker and his associates who allegedly plotted the ouster of the ‘then state consultant. Lou Lang in 2019.
Lang, a Democrat from Skokie, has already testified twice earlier than the U.S. Attorney’s Office concerning the embarrassing episode that ended his political profession, which centered on a sexual harassment allegation that Madigan believed was about to grow to be public.
In a wiretapped name that the jury is anticipated to listen to, Madigan’s longtime confidante, Michael McClain, advised Lang: “I simply assume it is in your greatest curiosity to depart whilst you’re robust and never undergo this, should you’re nonetheless a member It’s not me speaking anymore, I’m an agent.
“I recognize you being sincere with me,” Lang responded, asking for per week to consider it. “I would not do something to hurt my speaker or my caucus. He was superb to me.
Lang resigned simply days earlier than being sworn in for a brand new time period in January 2019.
Prosecutors exaggerated the episode to bolster the truth that Madigan had made the selections in Springfield and was consumed with staying in energy above all else. The recordings additionally bolstered allegations that McClain acted as an “agent” for the famously reclusive speaker, delivering messages and finishing “assignments” for his boss even after McClain retired from lobbying in 2016.
Prosecutors stated they are going to name Lang to the stand Wednesday after former state Rep. Scott Drury’s testimony concludes.
Madigan, 82, of Chicago, who was speaker of the Illinois House for many years and head of the state Democratic Party, faces racketeering fees that allege he ran his state and political operations as a legal enterprise, plotting with Utility giants ComEd and AT&T gave his mates contracts that required little or no work and used his public place to drum up enterprise for his non-public regulation agency.
Both Madigan and McClain, 77, a former ComEd lobbyist from southern Quincy state, have pleaded not responsible and denied any wrongdoing.
The trial started in earnest with opening statements this week. In his opening assertion to the jury Tuesday, McClain lawyer John Mitchell stated prosecutors are attempting to criminalize the authorized lobbying and relationship-building on the coronary heart of state politics.
“They had been so targeted on Mike Madigan that they seen,” he stated. “He didn’t act in an try and bribe Mike Madigan or assist him acquire bribes. … He is 100% harmless.”
Drury, a Highwood Democrat and former federal prosecutor, testified Tuesday concerning the internal workings of the Illinois General Assembly, how payments transfer by means of the House and the foundations and machinations that gave Madigan a lot energy .
Drury advised the panel he ended up on Madigan’s unhealthy aspect after refusing to take Illinois Democratic Party cash in his 2016 re-election bid and later turning into the one member of the Democratic caucus to not vote for him to stay president.
Eventually, Drury stated, tensions between him and Madigan escalated to the purpose that Drury thought of working for speaker of the House himself, and early in Drury’s third time period didn’t vote for Madigan to maintain that publish. After that, Drury stated, he could not bear in mind passing a single invoice.
But Madigan lawyer Todd Pugh, below cross-examination, confirmed Drury proof that he truly sponsored at the least 4 House-passed payments throughout his third time period, and that there isn’t a file within the file that Madigan made any effort to dam them. .
Cross-examination was anticipated to proceed on Wednesday.
jmeisner@chicagotribune.com
Originally printed:
