A hairdresser of St. Petersburg was assigned a jail sentence of 5 years and two months on prices of disseminating false information on the Russian military.
Anna Alexandrova denied publishing eight messages in opposition to the battle on social media, insisting on the truth that the case was motivated by a dispute on a land with a neighbor.
His neighbor informed the BBC that he had complained to the ministries after Alexandrova had despatched the pictures of the battle to Ukraine to his daughter.
By discrediting the armed forces and deliberately disseminating false information on the military, it grew to become a criminal offense in Russia a couple of weeks after the huge rejection of Ukraine in February 2022.
Since the start of the battle, the Kremlin has intensified a repression of dissent, gathering a whole lot of opponents and critics and silenced impartial media.
In a separate case on Tuesday, 4 journalists have been imprisoned in Moscow for 5 and a half years after being judged responsible of working for an “extremist group”.
Antonina Favorskaya, Kostantin Gabov, Sergey Karelin and Arthyom Kriger had all insisted on the truth that they have been solely doing their job as journalists, however the court docket found that they’d produced works utilized by an anti -corruption group based by the opponent’s head of Putin Alexei Navalny.
Navalny was discovered useless in a prison colony within the polar circle of the Arctic final yr. The video captured by Favorskaya on a video hyperlink within the classroom the day earlier than the controversial demise of Navalny was the final time it was seen alive.
Favorskaya labored for the impartial outlet Sotavision and ultimately he was arrested in March 2024 throughout the capturing in a cemetery through which he was buried.
The restrictive legal guidelines of Russia on dissent concerned individuals of each social class.
The complaints led to jail phrases and the Russians knowledgeable their colleagues and different individuals they know, in actions that keep in mind the Soviet period when a boy named Pavlik Morozov was lionized for having betrayed his father.
The hairdresser Anna Alexandrova, a 47 -year -old mom of two kids, was arrested for the primary time in November 2023 for eight posts which he shared by means of two nameless accounts on the Russian social community Vkontakte.
When the editor of the BBC Russia Steve Rosenberg visited the court docket final September, Alexandrova’s lawyer informed him that the case had began as a traditional home quarrel on Earth.
“A component went to the police however didn’t come wherever. This has modified solely when the accusation of” false information on the military appeared “,” mentioned Anastasia Pilpentnko.
Steve Rosenberg: How Boccone custody evokes the ghosts of the Soviet past
It emerged that Anna Alexandrova was initially from the identical a part of her neighbor to struggle the native deforestation by the builders within the village of Korpikyullya, south of St. Petersburg.
But ultimately they fell in a row that they grew to become more and more acro.
Although Alexandrova denied sending pictures from the battle to his neighbor, the court docket despatched him to a prison colony and ordered her to not publish additional supplies for the following three years.
In the meantime, the attorneys of a Moscow councilor who was awarded the primary interval of full jail in July 2022 pursuant to the regulation of “False News” filed a grievance in opposition to the crime with the Constitutional Court of Russia.
Alexei Gorinov initially had seven years of jail after being shot criticizing the invasion of Russia throughout a gathering of the Council. He had objected to the concept a kids’s drawing competitors was held when the youngsters have been dying in Ukraine.
That preliminary sentence was prolonged by one other three years final yr when he was accused of criticizing the battle in a jail hospital.
In a declaration on Tuesday, the attorneys Katerina Tertukhina and Olga Podoplelova mentioned that the 2022 article geared toward combating disinformation didn’t serve constitutionally authentic goals.
“Under the pretext of defending public order, it’s used to punish opinions in opposition to battle, criticisms of the authorities and the dissemination of knowledge – together with truthful data – if the official narrative contradicts”, the attorneys supported.
